Essay on Prop 37

The just To Know trace 37 November 2012 Elections American Government Professor James Cema proffer 37 is regarding labeling Genetically Engineered (GE) Foods. GE Foods is the reference given to the feed that consists of genetically engineered ingredients that be use to develop new fructify and animal varieties that atomic number 18 later use as a source of feeds by the general public. Typically the modification is look at to cr eat upe a protection of the crops from pests. hypnotism 37 is kn confess as the decline to Know act.This labeling process would be recyclable to consumers. The process would too create a level of responsibility among mass producers of corn, alfafa, soy, dent beets and certain(prenominal) baby formulas commonly used by consumers so that the consumer can come to an informed decision nigh what consumers argon feeding themselves and their families. (Attorney General, 2012). For example, Wal-Mart is now selling a brand of sweet corn that has bee n genetically miscellanea to produce pesticides in its own tissue.Genetically Modified corn is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency as an insecticide but there is NO LABEL requirement to let the consumer accredit that the corn has been modified at all. (League of Women, 2012) Proposition 37 would also prohibit viandss labeled natural to use any of the antecedently mentioned ingredients of GE Foods. Certified organic intellectual nourishments would be considered exempt from the labeling, foods that were unintentionally produced with genetically engineered framework be also exempt as ar foods sold for immediate white plague including restaurant foods and alcoholic drinks.Pros for this belongingsosition embarrass raising the consumers level of knowingness of what is going into their bodies which could help to avoid certain allergic and ongoing adverse wellness reactions in some consumers. The proposition would follow food producers very little to chip in or cha nge the wording on the label of the foods that ar produced. Cons for this proposition are that the mandatory labeling would open the food manufacturers to flyaway lawsuits by consumers.There is also concern among food producers regarding the cost of switching to non-genetically modified ingredients to fall out with the labeling requirement. The fear is that the food would become uttermost too expensive to the consumer. (The truth closely prop 37. 2012) I jump the labeling of genetically modified food and here is why, I believe that we, as consumers, have the in force(p) to know what is being forefathere to our food before our food is placed on our table to feed our family.I believe that giving medication has placed so many rules and regulations on many of the products that we consume including calorie come on certain items for sale in restaurants, warning labels on the side of cigarettes, nutritionary labels on most of our food and so forth There is an obligation that the government should mandate, that would intromit the consumer to make an informed decision approximately what he or she is feeding her family. I am not for this proposition because I believe 100% that Genetically modified foods are bad for us, I seizet believe there has been plenteous research in the department to make that informed of a decision.I just dont want to unknowingly eat genetically modified foods. I support this measure because as it states, I find oneself I have the right to know. The enemy states that the labeling would open frivolous lawsuits, this is suspicious, because if, the GM Foods are not causing a health encounter, why would there be a fear of frivolous lawsuits? It seems to be that the food manufacturers are aware of some riddle of risk and unwilling to share that risk via a label that lets the consumer know the risks involved.The different argument that the process to label the food would be costly I view they are scared that given a choice, consu mers would not knowingly consume genetically modified foods, which would hurt their wallets. I also think that there is a blown-up business agenda in the read/write head of the opposition of this bill which is backed by MILLIONS of dollars to stop this bill from being passed which alarms me into keep the bill. Companies like PepsiCo. , Coca Cola, and Nestle which are HUGE producers of highly processed foods are supporting the negative campaigns behind prop 37.Each company contributing over a million dollars to stop this bill. Cant they just use the money to change their labels and be done with it? Bibliography The truth about prop 37. (2012). Retrieved October 29, 2012 from http//www. carighttoknow. org/ League of women voters of California grooming Fund. (2012). Retrieved October 29, 2012 from http//cavotes. org/assets/forprint/2012Nov-ProsCons-bw. pdf Proposition 37 Genetically Engineered Foods. Labeling. endeavor Statute. (Attorney General, 2012). Retrieved October 29, from http//www. californiapropositions. org